Al Jazeera: The ‘mess’ that oil made

Al Jazeera: The ‘Mess’ That Oil Made

Al Jazeera’s Inside the Americas covered GAP’s report on the devastating effects of BP’s use of Corexit to “clean up” its oil spill in the Gulf. Guests included Mark Hertsgaard (the journalist who wrote the first in-depth piece on our findings), a former cleanup worker, an attorney representing plaintiffs against the manufacturer of Corexit, and a spokeswoman from the Louisiana Environmental Action Network (which worked closely with GAP on the report).
~~~
Kidney damage, liver damage, and memory loss are just some of the health effects being reported by many who worked on the BP oil spill cleanup.

BP essentially mounted a cover-up, they made that oil spill disappear, at least from the world’s television screen.

Mark Hertsgaard, independent journalist

Time and again, those working to clean up the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill were assured that Corexit, the chemical they were using to disperse the oil, was as safe as “dishwasher soap”.

In a statement issued by BP, the oil company said: “Use of dispersants during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was co-ordinated with and approved by federal agencies including the US Coast Guard and EPA.

“Based on extensive monitoring conducted by BP and the federal agencies, BP is not aware of any data showing worker or public exposures to dispersants that would pose a health or safety concern.”

According to a new report released by the Government Accountability Project, nearly half of workers reported that their employers told them Corexit did not pose a health risk.

And nearly all those interviewed, reported receiving minimal or no protective equipment despite warnings clearly spelled out in the manual provided by Corexit’s manufacturer.

Now three years on, many cleanup workers are reporting serious health problems including seizures, temporary paralysis and memory loss.

So, was the chemical used to disperse the oil more destructive than the oil itself?

To discuss this, joining on Inside Story Americas, with presenter Shihab Rattansi, are guests: Marylee Orr, an executive director of the Louisiana Environmental Action Network, which worked closely with the Government Accountability Project on their report; Daniel Becnel, an attorney representing plaintiffs against the manufacturer of Corexit; and Mark Hertsgaard, an independent journalist.

We also spoke to one former cleanup worker, Malcom Coco, who is taking part in a lawsuit against BP.

Sign TakePart’s petition to ban Corexit and other toxic oil dispersants!

Key Quote: According to a new report released by the Government Accountability Project, nearly half of workers reported that their employers told them Corexit did not pose a health risk.

And nearly all those interviewed, reported receiving minimal or no protective equipment despite warnings clearly spelled out in the manual provided by Corexit’s manufacturer.

h/t and enormous gratitude to GAP

Ongoing health issues (printed version here):

From Andrew Sullivan:
The Deepwater Horizon Legacy

Brian Merchant marks the three-year anniversary of the rig explosion by checking in on the damage:

Billy Nungesser, the president of Plaquemines Parish, which covers the part of Louisiana most heavily hit by oil after the initial spill, says that the oily fallout continues to this day. Just yesterday, Nungesser told a local TV news station that “oil is still washing ashore in places like Bay Jimmy.”

Meanwhile, fishermen say their catch is still drastically lower than it was before the spill—and the onslaught of chemical dispersants BP used to try to contain it. “The damage is still ongoing right now. My shrimp is down 40 percent and my oysters are down 93 percent,” George Barisich, president of the United Commercial Fisherman’s Association, recently told Eyewitness News. He believes that the dispersant—a proprietary cocktail called Corexit that is believed to be comprised of butoxyethanol, organic sulfonates, and a small concentration of propylene glycol—interrupted the reproductive cycle of the shellfish in the region.

Mark Hertsgaard focuses in on the controversy surrounding Corexit at the time:

Wilma Subra, a chemist whose work on environmental pollution had won her a “genius grant” from the MacArthur Foundation, told state and federal authorities that she was especially concerned about how dangerous the mixture of crude and Corexit was: “The short-term health symptoms include acute respiratory problems, skin rashes, cardiovascular impacts, gastrointestinal impacts, and short-term loss of memory,” she told GAP investigators. “Long-term impacts include cancer, decreased lung function, liver damage, and kidney damage. (Nineteen months after the Deepwater Horizon explosion, a scientific study published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Pollution found that crude oil becomes 52 times more toxic when combined with Corexit.)

BP even rebuffed a direct request from the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa Jackson, who wrote BP a letter on May 19, asking the company to deploy a less toxic dispersant in the cleanup. Jackson could only ask BP to do this; she could not legally require it. … Knowing that EPA lacked the authority to stop it, BP wrote back to Jackson on May 20, declaring that Corexit was safe.

Meanwhile, Shiva Polefka is disappointed by Congress’ inaction since the accident:

[T]he legislative branch has yet to pass a single law strengthening federal oversight of offshore oil and gas development. Congress did enact the RESTORE Act which allocates 80 percent of BP’s civil penalties to the affected Gulf Coast states, so they can apply it directly the environmental restoration and economic recovery. …[O]ther than the RESTORE Act, Congress has done “nothing about the many other critical issues the Commission identified to improve safety and environmental protection.” A year ago, my colleagues at the Center for American Progress highlighted the need for Congress to raise the absurdly low $75 million limit on spill liability that oil companies currently face. While BP voluntarily excluded itself from the cap, the cleanup cost for Deepwater Horizon to date stands at over $14 billion, demonstrating starkly the fiscal as well as environmental risk to the American public from Congressional inaction. Similarly, Congress has refused to codify any new safety standards for offshore drilling. As a result, the gains made through Obama administration rulemaking, and voluntary industry efforts, could easily be easily lost to the whims of the next administration.

Advertisements

One thought on “Al Jazeera: The ‘mess’ that oil made

  1. Pingback: BP knowingly poisoned the Gulf and its People. The Obama Admin helped cover it up. | occupy blogosphere

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s